I cannot choose between Firth and mcfayden. In reality, Firth is a better representation of Darcy, but Mcfayden creates a more emotive man. Both are equally attractive, and both do a pretty top notch job.
it is a truth universally acknowledged, that Mc-whathisname is NOTHING next to Collin Firth,…. he is the only one who can play Darcy, and the “new” movie with Knightly and Mcfayden is nothing next to the original one.
Where are the emotions?The face of her father is like NOTHING when he say oh my dear.o.O
Keira and Matthew are the real thing!
(for me,of course everyone has his or her own opinion^^)
colin firth may have been the better darcy, and elizabeth’s personality is depicted better in this miniseries. but i dont think their love here is as passionate as the one in the movie. the movie was much more romantic.
I absolutely adore Colin Firth in this, so dashing and handsome . However I feel there could have been more emotion after the wedding ceremony, for instance before the kiss he never touches her, not even to hold her hand or stroke her face.
There is no emotion, a very restrained pair indeed! Jane and her hubby are more natural IMO
I LOVE THIS MOVIE!!! i saw it for the first time when i was 4 and it never gets old!! this cast is absolutely perfect especially Jennifer and Colin you couldnt ask for a better Lizzy and Darcy, sorry Keira i just dont think she was up to it i love her as an actress but she just is not Lizzy!!
well gotta say this now. this version represents life and people in the 18th/19th century better than the other version and the faces are more adequate. but i think both versions are great, depends on which you saw first and with which version you connect more feelings. and its really annoying to see how many people bash on colin OR mathew…
Hi! I'm Denzyl. 26 years old. Thank you for dropping by. This is my everything under the sun blog. Enjoy browsing my site! If you want to have an updates of blog, subscribe now!
Hi! I'm Denzyl. 26 years old. Thank you for dropping by. This is my everything under the sun blog. Enjoy browsing my site! If you want to have an updates of blog, subscribe now!
25 Comments: Trackback URL | Comments RSS
September 24th, 2009 at 7:54 pm
Knightly is the best Eliza Bennett
September 26th, 2009 at 9:37 am
oh my me mine…jane really is ugly…and..elizabeth ..um…old?
September 28th, 2009 at 9:54 am
keira knightley and matthew macfadyen are the best
September 30th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
I’am agree with you.
October 8th, 2009 at 11:24 am
no, they’re NOT!
Colin Firth is the better Mr. Darcy.
October 9th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
I cannot choose between Firth and mcfayden. In reality, Firth is a better representation of Darcy, but Mcfayden creates a more emotive man. Both are equally attractive, and both do a pretty top notch job.
October 15th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
it is a truth universally acknowledged, that Mc-whathisname is NOTHING next to Collin Firth,…. he is the only one who can play Darcy, and the “new” movie with Knightly and Mcfayden is nothing next to the original one.
October 15th, 2009 at 9:04 pm
im sorry…i just have to say this but i would never want my wedding to be doubled
October 22nd, 2009 at 5:57 pm
Where are the emotions?The face of her father is like NOTHING when he say oh my dear.o.O
Keira and Matthew are the real thing!
(for me,of course everyone has his or her own opinion^^)
October 24th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
*sigh* and *clap-clap-clap*!
October 25th, 2009 at 4:28 am
yeah
it sounds cute
but in reality….
uggggh
October 25th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
I would have liked to see the wedding in the new version.
October 29th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
for ur consern……the book is much better than any of the 2 versions….!!!!..^^
loulz…[[bingleys eyes are awesome..:)..
October 30th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
i agree the book is much much better!!!
October 31st, 2009 at 1:47 am
colin firth may have been the better darcy, and elizabeth’s personality is depicted better in this miniseries. but i dont think their love here is as passionate as the one in the movie. the movie was much more romantic.
November 2nd, 2009 at 7:12 pm
i think their love is just as passionate (:
its just far lass obvious, which makes it much interesting
November 3rd, 2009 at 8:50 pm
I prefer 2005 version! There is no emotion in this on!
November 5th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
both the Darcie’s are gorgeous, but i will always prefer this version.
November 13th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
i agree! it is nice that they put the wedding in this one but yeah Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth show no emtion really!
November 15th, 2009 at 12:32 pm
I absolutely adore Colin Firth in this, so dashing and handsome
. However I feel there could have been more emotion after the wedding ceremony, for instance before the kiss he never touches her, not even to hold her hand or stroke her face.
There is no emotion, a very restrained pair indeed! Jane and her hubby are more natural IMO
November 17th, 2009 at 3:48 am
It is possible to have illusions always…
and be objective…
but I agree it woman beautiful Keira…
but whole movie is worse..
November 18th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
An innocent upper class movie. Innocent by modern standards
November 19th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
I LOVE THIS MOVIE!!! i saw it for the first time when i was 4 and it never gets old!! this cast is absolutely perfect especially Jennifer and Colin you couldnt ask for a better Lizzy and Darcy, sorry Keira i just dont think she was up to it i love her as an actress but she just is not Lizzy!!
November 25th, 2009 at 5:27 am
I think their all to old in this movie
November 25th, 2009 at 4:51 pm
well gotta say this now. this version represents life and people in the 18th/19th century better than the other version and the faces are more adequate. but i think both versions are great, depends on which you saw first and with which version you connect more feelings. and its really annoying to see how many people bash on colin OR mathew…